Linguistic relativism does NOT apply to low level language coders

The famous Sapir - Whorf hypothesis says that language influence the way people think i.e. linguistic relativismWhorf proposed: 'We cut nature up, organize it into concepts, and ascribe significances as we do, ...and is codified in the patterns of our language'. Sapir said: 'Human beings...are very much at the mercy of the particular language which has become the medium of expression for their society.

Normal discussion on pros and cons of programming languages contains (un)availability of features. But both languages are based on same computational powers and should be able to perform all tasks that the hardware is capable of. However, how these languages defer possibly are concepts about ease of use and expressiveness. And this may restrict solving ability of developers as explained by linguistic relativism.

Low level language developers are not restricted by any language concepts but the actual capability of hardware. In the end, they are the closest to assembler, ones and zeroes. so i believe low level language developers are the most logical person,  best solution developer and most efficient debugger.

But what about human languages!!! 





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Are EVs eco-friendly in India?

Field force tracking app - free app made using Google services in weekend !

COVID: LoC and my need of premise to blame